Mongoose :: Comparison

What should I consider when deciding between building internally versus buying?
Why not simply use AI and “vibe coding” to implement it?
Why not simply search for free examples and implement it yourself?
Why not search for a similar project and utilize that instead?

Q: What should I consider when deciding between building internally versus buying?

A: Opting to build an internal tool or software often falls short in value compared to focusing on delivering the core product your company sells.

Consider the following questions:

How essential is this tool or software for your company?
Does it truly outweigh the benefits of building your core product?

Taking a moment to evaluate whether building internally is genuinely worth pursuing before investing substantial time in it is a wise approach. It's far more satisfying than grappling with the challenges of a poorly executed system for years.
Learn from a real-life story of a developer who discovered the repercussions of making the wrong choice between building internally versus buying: ”Making the wrong choice on build vs. buy”.

Q: Why not simply use AI and “vibe coding” to implement it?

A: Bad idea! Here is why:

Relying on AI “vibe coding” to auto-generate an embedded networking stack is essentially like building it in-house with an unpredictable assistant. It might seem quick and trendy, but it’s a suboptimal strategy for such critical functionality.
Consider also the following:

1. Unpredictable Bugs & Instability

Even highly skilled teams can’t avoid bugs in freshly written networking code, especially in complex or hard-to-reproduce corner cases. AI-generated code might appear to work at first but often hides subtle errors that can destabilize your device or degrade user experience. In fact, seasoned engineers warn that vibe-coded solutions tend to introduce exactly these kinds of hidden flaws and maintenance headaches. Neglecting such pitfalls will hurt your customers’ experience and can damage your reputation.
By choosing a proven solution like the Mongoose library, you tap into a codebase already vetted by years of real-world use, safeguarding your product’s stability and reliability from day one.

2. Security Vulnerabilities

AI-suggested code doesn’t undergo rigorous security vetting. In networking software, one overlooked flaw can become a serious breach. Research has found that a large portion of AI-generated code contains critical security issues (for example, ~40% of AI-written database queries were vulnerable to injection attacks). A freshly generated HTTP/TCP stack or TLS implementation is not automatically scanned for such holes, so an AI-derived network module could unwittingly expose your product to exploits.
By contrast, a well-tested library like Mongoose has been continuously audited and hardened over time – using it greatly reduces the chance of severe vulnerabilities impacting your device.

3. Maintenance Burden & Hidden Costs

When you let AI generate a complex networking component, you become responsible for its long-term upkeep. AI output can be a “black box” – it works initially, but the logic behind it is often opaque, making debugging or extending it a real challenge. Developers end up spending significant time reviewing, fixing, and refactoring AI-generated code to ensure it’s reliable. This creates a hidden and unpredictable maintenance burden on your team, consuming resources just like any in-house project. Every hour spent wrestling with an AI-fabricated network stack is an hour not spent on your core product.
In contrast, licensing a stable networking library offloads that burden: Mongoose Library expert developers handle the hard parts (maintenance, updates, support), allowing your team to focus on what you do best.

4. Performance & Resource Constraints

Embedded systems have tight CPU, memory, and power budgets. AI-generated code might be functional, but it’s rarely optimized for the small footprint or efficiency that embedded networking demands. In practice, vibe-coded prototypes often show performance bottlenecks or memory leaks when pushed to production-level workloads. You could spend weeks chasing down why your AI-written TCP/IP stack slows down or crashes under heavy traffic. Fixing these issues after the fact is difficult and costly, especially under resource constraints.
On the other hand, a production-grade library like Mongoose is optimized through decades of refinement, delivering high performance and a small footprint from the start. You get a responsive, efficient network stack without needing to become an expert in low-level optimizations yourself.

5. No Track Record or Support

An AI-fabricated network stack has zero proven track record. You’d be deploying essentially untested code and hoping it behaves under all conditions – a risky gamble for critical infrastructure. If it fails or misbehaves in the field, you’re on your own to diagnose and fix it.
By contrast, a professional library like Mongoose comes with decades of real-world use and trust behind it. It’s been deployed on hundreds of millions of devices over 21+ years, and even NASA relies on it aboard the International Space Station as proof of its reliability and security. That kind of pedigree means most issues have long been discovered and resolved, and you have a dedicated support team to turn to if new ones arise. In short, licensing a well-developed, extensively tested, stable and production-proven networking stack gives you a level of confidence and support that ad-hoc AI “vibe coding” simply can’t match.

Q: Why not simply search for free examples and implement it yourself?

A: Bad idea! Here is why:

Choosing to implement a free solution and handling its internal support instead of purchasing from a trusted vendor is a suboptimal and less strategic choice. This approach introduces a hidden and unpredictable maintenance burden, akin to something developed in-house. Moreover, you miss out on the opportunity to deepen your understanding of the system since it's unlikely you can hire the person who originally created it.
Consider also the following:

1. Bugs

Bugs in freshly written software are virtually inevitable, particularly in complex or hard-to-catch corner cases. It's important to acknowledge that even with the most skilled development team and rigorous testing, some issues may arise as software complexity increases. These bugs can range from minor glitches to critical flaws that impact your product’s stability and reliability.
Neglecting the potential pitfalls associated with shortcuts can lead to a negative impact on your customers’ experience and satisfaction. Unresolved bugs and lack of proper support can lead to customers’ frustration, damaging your brand reputation and potentially driving customers away.
By choosing Mongoose Library you safeguard your product's stability, reliability, and overall success in the competitive technological landscape.

2. Security holes

Freshly written, proprietary software is not scanned for security holes. By opting for free solutions or in-house development without proper consideration, you're taking a risk with your product's security.
Investing in Mongoose Library provides access to well-tested and maintained software, reducing the likelihood of serious bugs affecting your product's security and performance.

3. Development time and cost

Additionally, the time required for development, maintenance, bug-fixing, and support can take a toll on your resources. The true cost of these activities often goes beyond the initial investment, as ongoing efforts are needed to ensure the software remains secure and up-to-date.
Choosing Mongoose Library can alleviate this burden, allowing your team to focus on core business objectives.

Q: Why not search for a similar project and utilize that instead?

A: When it comes to alternatives, Mongoose stands out with an impressive track record of deployment on hundreds of millions of devices worldwide in production.

With the Mongoose Library, we assure you of the following:

Exceptional performance and reliability, backed by a proven track record of over 21 years.
Rock-solid stability, effectively addressing critical issues faced by other alternatives.
Straightforward implementation facilitated by a single source file design and comprehensive documentation.
Continuous development and unwavering commitment to identifying and rectifying security vulnerabilities at an early stage, ensuring that your products remain relevant and secure in an ever-evolving technological landscape.

Mongoose Networking Library compared to other solutions

Comparison

Q: What should I consider when deciding between building internally versus buying?

A: Opting to build an internal tool or software often falls short in value compared to focusing on delivering the core product your company sells.

Q: Why not simply use AI and “vibe coding” to implement it?

A: Bad idea! Here is why:

1. Unpredictable Bugs & Instability

2. Security Vulnerabilities

3. Maintenance Burden & Hidden Costs

4. Performance & Resource Constraints

5. No Track Record or Support

Q: Why not simply search for free examples and implement it yourself?

A: Bad idea! Here is why:

1. Bugs

2. Security holes

3. Development time and cost

Q: Why not search for a similar project and utilize that instead?

A: When it comes to alternatives, Mongoose stands out with an impressive track record of deployment on hundreds of millions of devices worldwide in production.

What our customers say

What our returning customers say

Quick Links

Contact